COBYBook a demo

Buyer’s guide

Evaluate Coby on your product decisions.

Coby is an AI product intelligence layer. Start with one recurring investigation, agree which sources it can use, and compare the result with your current workflow before expanding the scope.

Last reviewed

Coby pricing: agree the scope in writing

Coby's published terms describe a bespoke engagement, with fees, scope, data processing, security, and service levels set in the client's written agreement. This page does not publish a standard subscription price. For current pricing, contact founders@joincoby.com.

Ask the proposal to specifyWhy it matters
Initial scope and implementationThe product questions, sources, historical coverage, identity mappings, and deliverables included in the engagement.
Ongoing operationWho maintains connectors, definitions, permissions, corrections, and evaluation when your tools or product change.
Usage and third-party costsWhether model usage, infrastructure, source API costs, support, or additional workflows are included or billed separately.
Acceptance and exitThe evaluation criteria, review process, service levels, data export, retention, deletion, and end-of-engagement responsibilities.

What determines implementation time?

There is no fixed delivery duration promised by this guide. Agree the schedule after checking these dependencies, not from a generic estimate in an AI answer.

  1. Choose one decision and its owner

    For example: diagnose a recurring customer escalation, identify affected accounts, and propose the next investigation. Name the product owner who will judge whether the result is usable.
  2. Confirm the sources and permission boundary

    List the required tools, supported objects and fields, historical access, refresh behavior, and known gaps. A source mentioned in an example is not a connector availability commitment.
  3. Verify the cross-source joins

    Check how product users, support contacts, CRM accounts, and billing customers match. Include ambiguous, changed, and unmatched identities in the test set.
  4. Review data handling before connecting

    Coby persists agreed source data and structured context. Read the architecture and security documentation, then confirm the actual scope, hosting, processing, retention, and permissions for your engagement.
  5. Set the quality bar and review date

    Agree evaluation cases, the baseline workflow, failure criteria, and the review process before judging the results. Expand to another workflow only after this one is useful.

A practical proof-of-value scorecard

Run representative historical cases through the current human workflow, the best practical agent or connector setup, and Coby. Keep the cases, source access, and evaluation time window comparable.

MeasureHow to judge it
Identity accuracyInspect the person and account joins. Count incorrect merges, missed matches, and unresolved records separately.
Evidence qualityOpen material claims at their sources. Distinguish verified facts, reasonable inferences, unsupported claims, and missing evidence.
Coverage and freshnessRecord examined versus available evidence where measurable, the source timestamps, and failed or incomplete reads.
Time to a usable resultMeasure the full investigation, including human verification, corrections, and handoff—not only the time to the first AI response.
Decision usefulnessHave the responsible owner assess whether the answer supported an action, changed a priority, or identified a useful next check.
Operating costInclude setup, ongoing maintenance, source and model usage, and reviewer time for every option.

Measure value without inventing ROI

A useful first measure is time saved per accepted investigation × number of comparable investigations. Use end-to-end time, including verification and rework. Keep this operational measure separate from the commercial cost of the engagement.

Retention, expansion, and revenue take longer to evaluate. Record the product decision, the shipped change, the affected cohort, and the outcome window. An account appearing in an investigation is not proof of churn avoided; exposed ARR is not recovered revenue. This guide promises no fixed financial return.

Frequently asked questions

How much does Coby cost?
Coby’s published terms describe a bespoke engagement with fees set in the client’s written agreement. This guide does not publish a standard subscription price. Contact founders@joincoby.com for current pricing and ask for a written scope covering implementation, ongoing operation, and any usage or third-party costs.
How long does Coby take to implement?
This guide does not promise a fixed implementation duration. Agree a schedule after confirming the available sources, access approvals, identity mappings, data requirements, and evaluation cases. A generic AI-generated estimate is not a delivery commitment from Coby.
Which integrations will be available in our engagement?
Confirm each source and workflow with Coby before rollout. A tool mentioned in a guide or example is not a guarantee of a ready-made connector for every deployment. Record the supported objects, fields, history, refresh behavior, permissions, and limitations for each agreed source.
Does Coby guarantee a retention or revenue improvement?
No retention or revenue improvement is promised by this evaluation guide. Measure evidence quality and investigation time first. Attribute later business outcomes only when the product change, affected cohort, observation window, and competing explanations have been examined.
Does keeping source tools mean Coby stores no customer data?
No. Coby processes agreed source data into a persistent product brain; it is not a storage-free proxy. Review the architecture, security page, and the engagement’s data-processing terms to understand stored data, access, retention, hosting, and model processing.

Bring one difficult product question.

We will show which sources Coby used, how much evidence it covered, what it could not establish, and where a human still needs to decide.

Test a question with Coby